Findings & Outcomes:
State Priorities and Needs for Assistance
Download Findings & Outcomes
in PDF. You will need
Adobe
Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file.
Table of Contents
Background
The 1990 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and
its 1997 Amendments require state and local education agencies
to specifically address the needs of students with disabilities
as they transition from school to postschool goals such as college
or employment. The No Child Left Behind Act (2001) similarly places
a greater focus on educational outcomes for young people with
disabilities. Yet, far too many of the 6 million young people
with disabilities who attend our public schools today do not gain
the skills or knowledge needed to achieve positive postschool
outcomes upon exiting high school. National research data and
follow-up studies over the past two decades have found that youth
with disabilities have lower than desired academic achievement
levels; high dropout rates; substantial levels of under- and unemployment;
economic instability; and low levels of enrollment and completion
in postsecondary education and training. To further validate this
national data, the National Center on Secondary Education and
Transition (NCSET), a research and technical assistance and dissemination
center funded by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP),
U.S. Department of Education, identified eight challenges that
impact the future of secondary education and transition. These
challenges are:
- promote students' self-determination and self-advocacy;
- ensure students have access to the general education curriculum;
- increase the school completion rates of students with disabilities;
- make high school graduation decisions based on meaningful
indicators;
- ensure students access to and full participation in postsecondary
education and employment;
- increase informed parent participation and involvement in
education planning, life planning, and decision-making;
- improve collaboration and systems linkages at all levels;
and
- ensure the availability of a qualified workforce to address
the transition needs of youth with disabilities
These challenge areas are noteworthy as they mirror the technical
assistance activities set forth by NCSET.
^ Top of Page ^
Summit Results: What We Learned
The data collection process included a review of the pre-summit
assessment surveys completed by all registered state leadership
teams, and the state strategic action plans developed during the
Summit dialogue sessions. A self-assessment summary tool was provided
to each of the state team leaders prior to their arrival at the
Summit. This summary was intended to initiate discussion among
team participants concerning state outcomes issues, and provide
a "mindset" for participation in the upcoming Summit's
team activities. Each state team leader completed the self-assessment
form and forwarded it to the Summit planning committee. The form
provided preliminary information about: a) the priority issues
the state would focus on at the Summit; b) an assessment of their
current performance for continuous improvement in planning, implementing,
and evaluating strategies to address these priority issues; and
c) potential needs for technical assistance related to these issues.
At the National Leadership Summit, through facilitated discussions,
each state team completed a strategic action plan for improved
secondary education and transition results. In these plans, state
teams were encouraged to: a) identify at least 3 priority issues
concerning improving results of youth with disabilities; b) develop
3-5 state leadership goals/outcome statements for each identified
priority issue; c) develop 3-5 state- or federal-level action
steps for each identified goal; and d) identify the technical
assistance needed to implement and sustain these actions. Each
state team submitted a completed State Leadership Strategic Action
Plan to the Summit planning team.
Following the National Leadership Summit, researchers from the
University of Minnesota and TransCen, Inc. analyzed the self-assessment
surveys and the state action plans to identify the cross-state
(national) priorities for improving postschool results for youth
with disabilities. The ten priority content areas and three overarching
themes that emerged from the data are presented below:
State-level Infrastructure
1. State Systems Infrastructure
2. Data Design, Collection,
and Use
3. Collaboration
4. Professional Development
Programs and Services
5. Access to General Education,
Standards, and Testing
6. Postsecondary Access, Enrollment,
and Options
7. Graduation/Dropout Rates
8. Workforce Development and
Employment
Youth and Family
9. Person-Centered and Transition-Driven
Planning (IEPs, self-determination, independent living)
10. Family Education and Involvement
Figure 1 reveals the number of individual states identifying
each of the priority content areas in the state action plans developed
at the Summit.
|
Figure
1. Priorities
Identified by State Teams |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of States |
|
State-Level
Infrastructure |
|
Collaboration |
|
16 |
|
Professional Development |
12 |
|
Data Design Collection and Use |
10 |
|
State Systems Infrastructure |
7 |
|
|
Programs
and Services |
|
Graduation/Dropout
|
|
8 |
|
Workforce Development and Employment
|
8 |
|
Access to General Education, Standards, and Testing |
7 |
|
Postsecondary Access, Enrollment, and Options |
6 |
|
Youth and
Family |
|
Person-Centered, Transition-Driven Planning |
|
11 |
|
Family Education and Involvement |
4 |
|
In addition, the researchers reviewed the goals/outcome statements
and action steps written in the state action plans, categorized
them by state and region, and aligned them with the previously
identified priority content areas (see Table 1).
This analysis illustrates, in more detail, particular secondary
education and transition challenges faced by specific states and
regions.
Table
1. State Team
Priorities from the National Leadership Summit |
|
Category |
|
State Team Priorites |
|
Primary Regional Designation |
|
|
|
STATE-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE |
|
|
State Systems Infrastructure
|
|
• Coordinated systems approach to transition
• State-level leadership and transition planning team
• Formalized central structure
• Identify and remediate systemic compliance issues
• National awareness of Native American transition
issues |
|
Mountain Plains, Southeast |
|
|
Data Design Collection
and Use |
|
• Improved and expanded data systems
• Effective, efficient data collection systems
• Establish shared data systems
• Data-driven and evidence-based decision making and
practice
• Collect and use postschool outcomes data |
|
Mountain Plains, Western, Great Lakes |
|
|
Collaboration |
|
• Build/increase/sustain state and local interagency
collaboration
• Increase state interagency coordination and system
linkages
• Interagency collaborative funding and cost-sharing
• Earlier interagency collaboration
• Build understanding among agencies about access
to services and resources
• Improve capacity of adult systems to provide postschool
support
• Create community councils to build awareness, e.g.
with WIBs |
|
Northeast, Mountain Plains, Mid-South, Southeast,
Western, Great Lakes |
|
|
Professional Development
|
|
• Professional development about IDEA and Rehabilitation
Act
• Develop understanding of relationship between NCLB
and IDEA
• Building awareness/recognition of value of transition
• Training and Technical Assistance for professionals
• Develop a Transition Specialist certificate program
• Develop cross-state transition academy at postsecondary
level
• Effective preservice and inservice teacher training
• Refine and disseminate transition curriculum for
teachers and others
• Provide more support for LEA teachers |
|
Mountain Plains, Great Lakes, Northeast
|
|
|
PROGRAMS AND SERVICES |
|
|
Access to General Education,
Standards, and Testing |
|
• Align transition with standards-based education
• High school reform
• Diploma options and high stakes testings
• Close achievement gap |
|
Northeast, Mountain Plains |
|
|
Postsecondary Access,
Enrollment, and Options |
|
• Build capacity of postsecondary system to serve
students with disabilities
• Improve postsecondary preparation and increase postsecondary
enrollment
• Improve postsecondary education
• Expand and improve postsecondary options |
|
Northeast, Mid-South |
|
|
Graduation/Dropout
|
|
• Improve graduation rate and decrease dropout
rate |
|
Mountain Plains, Southeast, Mid-South, Northeast
|
|
|
Workforce Development
and Employment |
|
• Improved career options and employment outcomes
• Business/education partnerships; engage employers
• Preparation for employment
• Increase postsecondary employment options through
resource alignment
• Collaboration with WIA programs |
|
Western, Mid-South, Mountain Plains |
|
|
YOUTH AND FAMILY |
|
|
Person-Centered and
Transition-Driven Planning |
|
• Self-determination and advocacy for students
and families
• Improved transition services and planning
• Move transition to middle school years
• Transition planning for ALL students
• Person-centered planning
• Youth participation in IEPs and transition planning
• Student-focused outcomes
• Increased independent living |
|
Mountain Plains, Western, Southeast, Great
Lakes |
|
|
Family Education and
Involvement |
|
• Training and Technical Assistance for students,
families
• Family involvement and person-centered planning
beyond the IEP
• Increased youth and family involvement
• Parental involvement, acceptance, and knowledge |
|
Western |
|
|
Finally, the technical assistance (TA) needs identified in the
state plans were synthesized and categorized into 15 cross-state
technical assistance content areas. These TA needs were then aligned
with the previously identified priority content areas (see Table
2).
Table 2. Technical Assistance Needs
Identified by State Leadership Teams at the National Leadership
Summit |
Technical Assistance Content
Areas |
Identifying "best practices" and federal directives
for efficient data design, collection, sharing, analysis,
and confidentiality |
Providing materials/guidance on teaching self-determination/advocacy |
Building interagency teams and developing interagency
agreements |
Bridging and aligning standards-based education and transition
services/planning |
Examining graduation and diploma options, and dropout
issues |
Engaging employers and employer organizations to improve
student employability through school/business partnerships
and WIA-funded programs |
Facilitating the resource mapping process |
Developing materials and delivering training on transition
and disability awareness to administrators, general and
special educators, and employers |
Providing guidance on state leadership activities (funding,
improvement plans, leadership teams) |
Improving professional development of teachers (pre-service
and in-service) on several topics (SSI, testing accommodations,
TIEP development, universal design for learning, career
awareness curricula, and research-based practices) |
Developing and implementing effective cross-agency training
|
Examining "best practices" in informing and
involving families through training activities and family/educator
partnerships |
Providing information regarding effective mentoring program
implementation |
Increasing postsecondary enrollment/options |
Developing databases and outcomes surveys (follow-along
and follow-up) |
^ Top of Page ^
Discussion
The priority issues that emerged from states in attendance at
the National Leadership Summit are consistent with those identified
in various national sources. States continue to stress the importance
of developing collaborative relationships and aligning special
programs with broader education and workforce reforms so that
all youth have the opportunity to achieve successful academic,
occupational, and social outcomes. These priorities also revealed
strong concerns from state leaders about collecting, reporting,
and using outcome data to improve services and programs. Moreover,
the education and involvement of youth and families in the transition
planning process remains a critical need. The priorities identified
during the Summit will continue to challenge NCSET and other national
technical assistance providers to work directly with states to
focus on developing more effective results-driven systems.
^ Top of Page ^
Next Steps
In supporting state improvement efforts identified in state action
plans from the National Leadership Summit, the technical assistance
needs have been aligned with the technical assistance delivery
efforts supported by NCSET. The intention is to use the information
gathered at the Summit to determine the content, scope, and delivery
methods of the technical assistance provided by the Center. NCSET
will draw upon several existing and new technical assistance strategies
including, but not limited to: NCSET's Web site, publications
(including Essential Tools), capacity-building institutes, and
national teleconferences. Additionally, efforts are underway to
develop new overarching technical assistance strategies to complement
and play a critical role in NCSET's overall state improvement
approach. The following four broad strategies, currently being
developed, are essential to NCSET's technical assistance plan
to support state improvement.
1. |
|
National Alliance on Secondary Education
and Transition (NASET). A national voluntary coalition,
the National Alliance on Secondary Education and Transition
(NASET), is currently being formed. NCSET's role will be
to support NASET's initial formation and facilitate plans
and actions NASET members deem important to address. One
of the first tasks NASET will tackle is the development
of a set of principles, standards, and/or criteria to serve
as a conceptual framework and model to guide policy development
and professional practice in secondary education and transition.
Such a framework will also help to support NCSET's overall
technical assistance approach in relation to state improvement
and other efforts. |
|
2. |
|
Technical Assistance Communities of
Practice. The Technical Assistance Communities of Practice
(TA Communities) are groups of state and local education
staff and other key stakeholders facing similar program
improvement challenges who have decided to band together
to share expertise, issues, and solutions. NCSET envisions
the establishment of several TA Communities over the next
year. The action plans developed by states at the National
Leadership Summit will serve as the basis for determining
the need for additional TA Communities. |
|
3. |
|
Technical Assistance to Individual States.
Through collaboration with other OSEP TA &D Centers
and Partners NCSET will work in partnership with OSEP and
several other national technical assistance and research
centers to help resolve complex and persistent special education
issues in individual states. The intent is to draw upon
the combined expertise of several technical assistance entities. |
|
4. |
|
National Leadership Summit II.
NCSET will conduct a second National Leadership Summit in
Spring 2005. State action plans from the first Summit have
been analyzed to identify technical assistance needs common
across several states and/or regions, and those needs which
appear to be specific to individual states. The purpose
of the second National Leadership Summit will be to assess
the progress states have made in addressing their state
priorities identified at the first National Leadership Summit
and continue to scale up federal and state secondary education
and transition policies, practices, and systems. |
^ Top of Page ^
Summary
The National Leadership Summit was pivotal as it introduced a
new way for NCSET to work with states in focusing on developing
more results-driven systems. The 42 states represented at the
Summit developed a strategic action plan for improved postschool
results for youth with disabilities in their states. The action
plans were analyzed to determine priority issues and technical
assistance needs by state and regions. This initial analysis demonstrated
three overarching themes and ten priority issues consistent with
national research. NCSET, along with the U.S. Department of Education,
the Regional Resource Centers, and other national technical assistance
centers, will respond to multi-state and individual state needs
based on the plans developed at the initial Summit.
^ Top of Page ^
|