Information Brief
Addressing Trends and Developments in Secondary Education and Transition
October 2004 • Vol. 3, Issue 5
Teaching Social Skills
By Christine D. Bremer and John Smith
Introduction
To achieve the best outcomes possible, transition-age youth need specific
skills in areas such as math, literacy, and independent living. However, skills
in these areas will not assure successful outcomes in the absence of adequate
social skills. Social skills form the basis for social competence. Gresham,
Sugai, and Horner (2001) define five dimensions of social skills: (a) peer relational
skills, (b) self-management skills, (c) academic skills, (d) compliance skills,
and (e) assertion skills (pp. 333-334). They define social competence as “the
degree to which students are able to establish and maintain satisfactory interpersonal
relationships, gain peer acceptance, establish and maintain friendships, and
terminate negative or pernicious interpersonal relationships” (p. 331).
This brief reviews research on the importance of social skills for youth and
highlights strategies for teaching social skills to youth with disabilities.
Why are Social Skills Important?
Effective social problem solving requires reading one’s own and others’
feelings, and being able to accurately label and express those feelings. Such
skills are aspects of social and emotional learning (Zins, et al., 1998, p.
19). Well-developed social skills can help youth with disabilities develop strong
and positive peer relationships, succeed in school, and begin to successfully
explore adult roles such as employee, co-worker/colleague, and community member.
Social skills also support the positive development of healthy adult relationships
with family members and peers. Hair, Jager, and Garrett (2002) observe that
adolescents who have strong social skills, particularly in the areas of conflict
resolution, emotional intimacy, and the use of pro-social behaviors, are more
likely to be accepted by peers, develop friendships, maintain stronger relationships
with parents and peers, be viewed as effective problem solvers, cultivate greater
interest in school, and perform better academically (p. 3). Adequate social
skills need to be acquired while students are still enrolled in school and further
supported and refined in postsecondary, community, and work settings.
The role of social skills at school
Gresham, Sugai, and Horner (2001) note that deficits in social skills are key
criteria in defining many high-incidence disabilities that hinder students’
academic progress, such as specific learning disabilities, attention deficit/hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD), mental retardation, and emotional disturbance (p. 332). Therefore,
helping students learn social skills is a proactive approach to minimizing the
impact of these types of disabilities on school success.
When social skills are absent, educators cannot fully engage students in a
variety of learning experiences, especially those that are cooperative. As secondary
teachers increasingly use cooperative learning strategies across their curriculum,
the need for students to have strong social skills is evident. To participate
fully in cooperative learning, some students with disabilities need training
in skills such as giving and receiving feedback, listening, and appropriate
self-disclosure.
Social skills in the community and workplace
In community life, appropriate social behavior may be even more important
than academic or job skills in determining whether one is perceived as a competent
individual (Black & Langone, 1997). For example, Holmes and Fillary (2000)
investigated the ability of adults with mild intellectual disabilities to appropriately
engage in the “small talk” that is part of any workplace. They noted
that workers with intellectual disabilities who demonstrate competence in social
skills are generally perceived more positively than those who lack such skills,
regardless of task-related skill level (Holmes & Fillary, p. 274). The notion
that competence in using social skills will lead to positive perceptions of
persons with disabilities can be extended to other community settings such as
postsecondary education, neighborhoods, and places of worship.
Instructional Strategies for Teaching Social Skills to Adolescents With Disabilities
Anyone who has tried to improve another person’s social skills knows
there are significant challenges to such an endeavor. Problems that interfere
with the effectiveness of social skill interventions may include oppositional
behavior, conduct problems, negative influences from peer groups, substance
abuse, family difficulties, and limited cognitive abilities (Hansen, Nangle,
& Meyer, 1998).
Why would adolescents want to improve their social skills? Most likely, they
seek to (a) avoid the negative consequences of inadequate social skills, including
loneliness, job loss, or embarrassment at school or work; and (b) enjoy the
benefits of having good social skills, such as friendship, acceptance from others,
and good relationships at school and work. Nonetheless, students must see the
need for the skills being taught. In a school setting, teachers may ask students
to identify the social skills necessary for achieving goals important to them.
Based on such discussions, students and teachers can jointly select one or two
skills to work on at a time.
Using Cooperative Learning Strategies to Enhance Social Skill Development
The social skills needed by transition-age youth include those needed in school,
workplace, and community (see Table 1). Classroom teachers can help students
practice social skills needed in nonschool settings by teaching these skills
in the context of cooperative or work-based learning settings. Because students
need social skills to learn effectively in cooperative settings, many excellent
ideas for teaching social skills have been developed to support cooperative
learning and can be found in cooperative learning curricula and resources.
Once students move into the workforce, they need additional skills. Some skills
can be learned on-the-job. Holmes and Fillary (2000) note:
When we join a new workplace we need to learn not only the technical terminology
and the in-group jargon, we also need to acquire the norms for interaction—the
appropriate ways of addressing and referring to people, the acceptable level
of informality in meetings of different sizes, and involving people of different
status (p. 275).
Table 1. Social Skills Needed by Transition-Age
Students |
|
Dimensions of Social Skills (Categories
from Gresham, Sugai, & Horner, 2001) |
|
Peer
relational skills |
Self-management skills |
Academic skills |
Compliance skills |
Assertion skills |
General Social Skills |
Being on time |
|
X |
|
X |
|
Using appropriate loudness and tone of voice |
|
X |
|
|
|
Encouraging everyone to participate |
X |
|
|
|
|
Learning and using peoples' names |
X |
|
|
|
|
Looking at the person who is speaking |
X |
|
|
|
|
Making eye contact with others when speaking |
X |
|
|
|
|
Checking one's own understanding and asking appropriate questions |
|
|
X |
|
X |
Describing one's own feelings when appropriate |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
Keeping remarks to an appropriate length |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Building on others' comments and ideas |
X |
|
X |
|
|
Supporting others, both verbally and nonverbally |
X |
|
|
|
|
Asking for direction or assistance |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Participating appropriately in small talk |
X |
|
|
|
|
Initiating and responding to humor |
X |
|
|
|
|
Additional Social Skills Needed for Cooperative
Learning |
Moving into work groups without disturbing others |
|
|
|
X |
|
Staying with one's own group |
|
X |
|
X |
|
Keeping hands and feet to oneself |
|
X |
|
X |
|
Respecting time limits |
|
X |
|
X |
|
Setting group norms, such as "no put downs" |
|
|
|
X |
|
Staying on the topic |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Offering to explain or clarify |
|
|
X |
|
X |
Criticizing ideas, not people |
X |
|
|
|
X |
Including everyone |
X |
|
|
|
|
Additional Social Skills Needed for Work Environments |
Giving and responding to instructions |
|
|
|
X |
X |
Greeting customers |
X |
|
|
|
|
Responding to criticism |
|
|
|
X |
X |
Choosing and Implementing Programs
Dozens of programs have been developed to teach social and emotional skills
and knowledge. A recent comprehensive review of social and emotional learning
(SEL) programs is available from the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and
Emotional Learning (CASEL). Safe and Sound: An Educational Leader’s Guide
to Evidence-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs describes and
rates available evidence-based programs. It can be downloaded from the CASEL
Web site at http://www.casel.org, which includes other helpful
information about social and emotional learning.
According to CASEL (2003), implementation of a social and emotional learning
program is aided by taking the following steps:
- Establishing a steering committee;
- Conducting a needs and readiness assessment and coordinating efforts;
- Selecting a program;
- Developing a plan for first-year implementation;
- Reviewing, piloting, planning for expansion, and focusing on professional
development and supervision; and
- Monitoring the implementation process and evaluating program impact.
Creating a Positive School Climate
Consistent and effective use of acquired social skills is more likely to occur
in schools having a positive social atmosphere. Most adults can think of a situation
in which they didn’t feel valued and, as a result, did not respond appropriately
or compassionately to others. Schools can ensure that all students know they
are valued and respected members of a learning community by taking the following
steps to create a positive school climate (Curtis, 2003):
- Learn and use students’ names and know something about each student.
This can be difficult in secondary schools; using nametags or assigned seating
at the beginning of each term can be helpful.
- Hold daily classroom meetings each morning to help build a sense of community
and provide opportunities for conversation among students.
- Provide unstructured time (e.g., recess) when students can practice their
social skills with peers and experience feedback.
- Encourage journal writing to improve self-awareness.
- Provide opportunities for students to participate noncompetitively (without
tryouts or auditions) in extracurricular activities. Avoid unnecessary competition
among students.
- Provide ways for students to provide feedback regarding their experience
at school, and show them that their input is taken seriously.
- Make a point of connecting briefly and informally, over a period of several
days, with individual students who are having difficulties. This establishes
a relationship that will be helpful if the student’s situation requires
a more formal discussion at another time.
School size also has an impact on student attitudes and behaviors. Research
indicates that secondary students fare better socially and emotionally in schools
with, at most, 800 students. Smaller schools foster greater participation in
extracurricular activities, better attendance, lower dropout rates, and fewer
behavior problems (vandalism, aggression, theft, substance abuse, and gang participation).
Teachers in small schools are more likely than their counterparts in large schools
to use teaching methods that support the development of social skills, such
as cooperative learning and multiage grouping (Cotton, 1996).
To be effective and worthwhile, social-skills training must result in skills
that (a) are socially relevant in the individual’s life (social validity),
(b) are used in a variety of situations (generalization), and (c) are maintained
over time (treatment adherence) (Hansen, Nangle, & Meyer 1998). Such skills
will be most consistently employed in a setting that is supportive and respectful
of each person’s individuality.
Conclusion
In summary, social skills are pivotal to successful transition to adult life
for youth with disabilities. Cooperative learning, role-playing, and participation
in social and emotional learning programs foster the acquisition of these skills.
In addition, a positive school climate supports social learning by providing
an environment in which all students are valued and respected.
Teaching Social Skills Through Role Playing and Observation
Role playing is a helpful technique for engaging student interest and
providing opportunities for practice and feedback. One way to establish
motivation and to inject some humor into the learning process is to ask
students to role play a situation in which the identified skill is lacking.
Role playing allows students to take on roles, provide feedback to one
another, and practice new skills. Role playing enables students to simulate
a wide range of school, community, and workplace interactions. For students
with intellectual disabilities, role playing can provide an opportunity
to practice appropriate small talk, a social skill that is key to acceptance
in the workplace.
Holmes and Fillary (2000) suggest extensive use of role-playing exercises
to help young adults with mental retardation develop automaticity with
small talk appropriate to the workplace. They suggest the following:
- Practicing automatic and brief responses for greetings and farewells.
Responses should be brief, appropriate, and unelaborated. To “how”
questions (e.g., “How are you doing?”) an appropriate response
is “Fine” or “Great.” To “what”
questions (e.g., “What’s up?), an appropriate response is
“Not much.” The ability to use automatic and appropriate
responses can be helpful in getting off to a good start in a new workplace.
- Practicing extending small talk by learning to add questions like
“How about you?” or “What about you?” or “What
have you been doing?” to the above responses.
- Role playing an interaction that includes acting out social errors,
spotting the errors, and correcting them in a subsequent role play (with
more able young adults). Examples of errors include inappropriate topics
for small talk; inappropriately long response or no response when one
is needed; inappropriately detailed response; and use of a small-talk
formula when it is not appropriate (p. 288).
|
References
Black, R. S., & Langone, J. (1997). Social awareness and transition to
employment for adolescents with mental retardation. Remedial and Special
Education, 18(5), 214-222.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (2003). Safe
and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-based social and
emotional learning (SEL) programs. Retrieved February 26, 2008, from http://www.casel.org/pub/safeandsound.php
Cotton, K. (1996). Affective and social benefits of small-scale schooling.
ERIC Digest. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small
Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED401088)
Curtis, D. (2003). 10
tips for creating a caring school. Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://glef.org/php/article.php?id=Art_1025
Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes
of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities.
Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331-344.
Hair, E. C., Jager, J., & Garrett, S. B. (2002, July). Helping
teens develop healthy social skills and relationships: What research shows about
navigating adolescence. Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://www.childtrends.org/Files/K3Brief.pdf
Hansen, D. J., Nangle, D. W., & Meyer, K. A. (1998). Enhancing the effectiveness
of social skills interventions with adolescents. Education and Treatment
of Children, 21(4), 489-513.
Holmes, J., & Fillary, R. (2000). Handling small talk at work: Challenges
for workers with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability,
Development and Education, 47(3), 273-291.
Zins, J. E., Elias, M. J., Weissberg, R. P., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N.
M., Frey, K. S., et al. (1998). Enhancing
learning through social and emotional education. Think: The Journal
of Creative and Critical Thinking, 9, 18-20. Retrieved August 29, 2003,
from http://www.casel.org/downloads/enhancinglearning.pdf
Authors Christine D. Bremer and John Smith are with the Institute on Community
Integration, University of Minnesota.
^ Top of Page ^
There are no copyright restrictions on this document. However, please cite and credit the source when copying all or part of this material.
This report was supported in whole or in part by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, (Cooperative Agreement No. H326J000005). The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, and no official endorsement by the Department should be inferred.
This publication is available in an alternate format upon request. To request an alternate format or additional copies, contact NCSET at 612.624.2097.
|